Let me start by saying that I am not fanatically devoted to the idea that people, in general, ought to be good (much less perfect) spellers. Nor do I believe that correct grammar is required to lead a wildly successful life.

Am I wrong in expecting that the news media should set the bar a little higher for themselves?

This is something that has long been a source of annoyance for me. It calls into question the very trustworthiness of the news media, especially when it not only quotes, but repeats without question that which they’ve been told. As it relates to the present, the thing that’s attracted my ire is the blind repetition of the term “carabineer” by media outlets in connection with the tragic incident at Lifest 2007. This is not so different than the phrase “bungee ride” that I had previously complained about.

I’m not a climber, and I’m certainly not a reporter, but let’s face it: “carabineer” is an unusual word. Even if it does pass an automated spelling check, one would think that it should at least trigger a quick peek into a favorite dictionary. Online versions are readily available if one is ever caught without a printed copy.

This isn’t the only inaccuracy I’ve seen in reports on the subject. You can lay a fair amount of blame on the Department of Commerce report, which is of course the source of the spelling error above. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s incumbent on reporters to check spelling and grammar just as well as they check the facts.

PS – Google is not a dictionary. I simply adore many things that Google has done, but beware of using standard screwdrivers to turn Torx™ heads.

Then, yesterday at about 4:40 p.m. the fun was interrupted by sirens. The first vehicle to arrive was a fire truck. My wife and I compared notes later and we both thought, “hey, carnival food, maybe a deep fryer caught fire”… and then we realized the truck was heading up toward the artist merchandise barn. Shortly after that, an ambulance arrived, and we knew something was terribly wrong. The obvious conclusion was that something had happened with the Air Glory ride near the barn.

I’m very, very upset by this tragedy. My heart grieves for the loss of this young woman; if the rumors are true, she wasn’t much older than my eldest. I can only imagine the pain that her family is suffering now, and I’m sure it’s worse than I can dream.

Here’s what UPI has to say:

A teenage girl was killed in a bungee-jumping accident Saturday at a Christian rock festival in Wisconsin.

United Press International – NewsTrack – Top News – Bungee jumper dies at Christian festival

The press coverage of this is very disturbing in a different way. This article is an example of how the press is propagating what appears to be one writer’s speculation. Air Glory is not a bungee jumping, or bungee-like, ride.

If you read the article, you’ll also be presented with some similarly uninformed “facts.” To clarify: The festival did not shut down for two hours. The festival did not simply resume scheduled events, either immediately or after some period of time.

I was there.

One problem with this reporting is that nobody bothered to understand what Air Glory was before putting pen to paper (or hands to keyboard). This amusement ride is a giant swing operated from a crane. Riders are suspended from the crane with cables, and when released, swing back and forth. They do not bounce, the cables do not stretch perceptibly, and there’s no jumping involved.

Another issue is with the reporting of what happened next. There simply wasn’t much scheduled around that time, so to say that the events shut down for two hours is misleading. Perhaps the reporters are trying to paint the image of event organizers “doing the right thing,” but all this does is give me the impression that they were more concerned about image than about what was going on. Artists were up on stage talking about what had happened, and on at least one stage they were soon singing songs of life and of hope; lest you think there were only “mellow worship songs” as reported you might consider checking out Red. Indeed, every artist and speaker I heard, including some while walking between events and eating dinner, took time during and between each event to express love and support for this girl and her family.

If I know the people who run Lifest – and I am acquainted with a number of them – they are directly and personally involved as much as they can be. They are not impersonal corporate suits. They are not there to make money (they’ve lost money on this festival every year). They love our youth, and it will be an even bigger tragedy if sloppy reporting like this makes anybody think otherwise.

UPDATE: At least one report in a local paper has correctly identified Air Glory as a “freefall swing ride.”

Sadly, it mostly seems to be propaganda.

In those limited circumstances, that might be true — although one would assume a planeload of bureaucrats, under the same conditions, would have made the same decision as the civilians on Flight 93.

Beating Up Government – Government Executive magazine

Um… okay.

Since when is “a planeload of bureaucrats” equivalent to “a bureaucracy”? Sure, they might be related, but this completely misses the point.

Say, is Mr. Shoop a bureaucrat?

UPDATE: Well, okay, I guess he’s not a bureaucrat. But I’m still amused.

Tortured logic

Andrew Sullivan, clearly wanting to engage with the “deranged”, has asked that I provide evidence that an attack was imminent, and therefore, as I argued, that torture to obtain information about the impending attack was necessary and legitimate. The entirety…

Is it just me, or is Mr. Sullivan’s strawman downright laughable? Of course, I expect that he will reject the evidence provided as unverified or unreliable. Or – and this is a serious point – he could argue that you can never prove that something was imminent if it ultimately didn’t happen. You see, even the actual airline tickets are not proof that something would have happened. Who knows, right? I mean, those tickets could have been intended to enable a meeting with an al Qaeda operative in the United States, or perhaps a meeting with Mike Wallace.

Those in the know, of course, understand that these so-called “tickets” are the product of a Bush-driven CIA conspiracy to imprison innocent Muslim men between the ages of 17 and 40. Just ask the DU. They’ll tell you.

LA Times caught lying to protect Murtha

Part of Murtha’s libel defense is that he was only repeating what he was told when he accused U.S. troops of murder “in cold blood.” The LA Times, in May, assisted in this assertion:[Marine Gen. Michael] Hagee last week briefed key congressional leaders on the upcoming report. One of …

Patterico reports on the latest developments…

Once more, with feeling:

President Bush did not say in any State of the Union address that the threat posed by Saddam Hussein was?imminent.? In fact, he said the exact opposite: [...]

He acknowledges that others in the administration characterized the threat as “imminent” and “immediate.” However, this doesn’t excuse the newspaper from shabby journalism.

Idiots.

(Er, dude, that’s a personal attack.?ed)

[Dear "Ed": Um. Yep.]

IraqiPundit responds:

It’s exactly that future — the Iraqis’ future — that Dowd can’t be bothered with. To her, it’s an occasion for cheap sarcasm. “Faced with their dystopia,” she writes, amusing herself. “the utopians are scaling back their grand visions for Iraq’s glorious future.”

Critics like Dowd see Iraq and Iraqis as beyond redemption, if not beneath contempt. Certainly, they are not worth bothering with or thinking about.

There’s a smattering of dissent, but it’s the doomsayers who seem to have the spotlight. Let us hope this only serves to challenge Iraqis to prove the press wrong.

Hmm, did you hear that? Why, it sounded just like a certain network’s credibility being flushed. Someone call Geraldo! (Not a chance.?ed)

Read the comments. There’s a gem or three hidden in there.

UPDATE: Allah makes note of an interesting connection… virtual, if not actual (via Instapundit). The photo, especially, has a hilarious double meaning. Go look now. I’ll wait.

(Okay, ready? Just get on with it.?ed)

Now, clearly we have two of our favorite journalismists all buddy-buddy and superimposed on an blown up image of one of the memos. The subject of the memo is what draws our attention; anybody who uses any form of instant messaging regularly may understand the letters “CYA” to mean something entirely different than what was meant in the original context.

One can only hope…

Don’t miss the weird twist that Power Line dug up, too. (via TAM)

And finally, there seems to be some issue with Bush “supporters” funding the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. I mean, really, who did they expect to fund the ads? Veterans for Kerry ‘04? Nader for President?

Tom Maguire notes that the New York Times has presented the astonishing revelation that Bush backers have donated to the Swifties.

You just can’t make stuff like this up.

None of this implies that Rather and CBS will change their tune. I fully expect denial until the public at large gets bored with the story. However, this may not actually be possible until the likes of Howard Dean and Terry McAuliffe stop referring to the 60 Minutes piece as factual reporting.

UPDATE: Both Instapundit and JustOneMinute link to a Jim Geraghty piece on “Rathergate.” Game over? It sure looks that way.

MORE: Power Line, from the start a clearinghouse for information on this, has more on the story about the story: L.A. Times reporter Peter Wallsten attempts to spin the blogosphere as unreliable even while acknowledging that “blogs are major players.” Also, don’t miss the link to Hugh Hewitt’s brilliant recap (and more).